ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2026
Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer in Rural Care.
Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Timely initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery improves survival for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Rural populations experience disproportionate delays, yet contextual drivers remain poorly understood. Objective: To identify barriers, facilitators, and themes influencing the receipt of timely PORT in rural settings to inform a future multilevel intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used a phased, patient- and caregiver-involved design at 2 rural northern New England cancer center clinics at Dartmouth Health. Phase 1 included 2 facilitated dialogues with patients, caregivers, and staff, followed by participant-led coding (referred to as Partnership Academies). Phase 2 included 3 facilitated dialogues focused on refining barriers, facilitators, and solutions-focused themes (2 with patients/caregivers and 1 with staff; referred to as Community Engagement Studios). Phase 3 included reviewing preliminary insights at a clinic staff retreat for feedback. Data were collected from November 2024 to April 2025 and analyzed from November 2024 to May 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Barriers, facilitators, and themes related to timely PORT initiation. Analysts used an inductive-deductive approach guided by Intervention Mapping and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, version 2.0. Results: Eleven individuals participated in the Partnership Academies and 18 in the Community Engagement Studios. Five barriers were identified (communication, care coordination, access to dental care, transportation, and confronting negative emotions), and 4 facilitators were identified (key staff as central contacts, caregivers as advocates, rural culture, and leveraging preexisting resources). Four themes emerged: (1) leveraging strengths, (2) managing the steep learning curve after cancer diagnosis, (3) the value of peer support, and (4) the desire for information support was far-reaching. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study examines PORT delays in a rural context with patient, caregiver, and staff voices. Findings highlight the importance of community resources, effective communication, and peer support to inform multilevel strategies aimed at reducing delays and improving equity in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.