ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor as a predictor of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMacrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pleiotropic pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This study aimed to evaluate whether serum MIF levels measured at baseline are associated with radiographic progression in AS patients assessed retrospectively over time.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study with concurrent healthy controls included 50 AS patients meeting the modified New York criteria and 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Serum MIF was measured by ELISA at baseline. Clinical assessment included Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Radiographic progression was assessed retrospectively using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) on radiographs obtained at baseline and at least 12 months later (median interval 24 months, range 12-36). Progressors were defined as patients with annualized mSASSS increase ≥ 1 unit/year. Two independent readers scored all radiographs while blinded to clinical data and time sequence.
resultsSerum MIF levels were significantly elevated in AS patients compared to controls (median 43.0 ng/mL vs. 11.2 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Among AS patients, 15 (30%) were classified as progressors. After adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, baseline mSASSS, smoking, and ESR in multivariable logistic regression, elevated MIF remained independently associated with progression (OR 1.85 per 10 ng/mL increase, 95% CI 1.08-3.18, p = 0.028). MIF levels correlated with disease duration (ρ = 0.299, p = 0.035), ESR (ρ = 0.669, p < 0.0001), and mSASSS score (ρ = 0.324, p = 0.021). ROC analysis demonstrated that MIF > 51 ng/mL discriminated progressors from non-progressors with AUC 0.746 (95% CI 0.599-0.893), sensitivity 53.3%, specificity 94.3%, positive predictive value 80.0%, and negative predictive value 82.5%.
conclusionBaseline serum MIF is independently associated with subsequent radiographic progression in AS patients after adjustment for key confounders. While sensitivity is modest (53%), the high specificity (94%) suggests that elevated MIF (> 51 ng/mL) may help identify patients at higher risk for progressive spinal damage. Key Points • Baseline serum MIF levels are independently associated with subsequent radiographic progression in AS after adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, baseline damage, smoking, and ESR. • MIF >51 ng/mL predicts progression with high specificity (94%) but modest sensitivity (53%), suggesting utility for identifying high-risk patients rather than screening all patients. • MIF correlates moderately with ESR (ρ=0.669) but shows independent prognostic value in multivariable models, consistent with MIF's dual role in driving inflammation and bone formation. • Rigorous radiographic methodology (blinded dual readers, ICC 0.94) and detailed ELISA protocols strengthen confidence in findings, though prospective validation in larger cohorts is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.