ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
An Investigation of Heterogeneity in Cerebellar Cortical Pathology Across Essential Tremor Cases: A Cluster Analysis.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an evolution of our understanding of the underlying neuropathological features of essential tremor (ET). Studies have revealed a cascade of neurodegenerative changes in the cerebellar cortex, centered on the Purkinje cell (PC) population and its surrounding neuronal populations and connections. A fundamental question is whether there is heterogeneity across ET cases with respect to the expression of this cerebellar pathology. We examined postmortem tissue from 155 ET brains using a set of 15 quantitative metrics of cerebellar cortical pathology determined by histologic and immunohistochemical methods. These metrics reflect changes across the PC body (PC counts, empty baskets, heterotopias), PC dendrites (swellings), PC axon (torpedoes), basket cell axonal hypertrophy and climbing fiber-PC dendrite synaptic changes. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify the major data dimensions. Outlier cases were then identified, followed by k-means clustering to identify subgroups of ET cases. The first 5 principal components explained 78.6% of the variance. Twenty-two (14.2%) cases were outliers. k-means clustering indicated that these 22 cases were distributed in 4 clusters. In each cluster, specific quantitative metrics of cerebellar pathology showed greater severity of change than observed in the main group of 133 ET cases. A small number of clinical features distinguished clusters from one another, although these analyses were limited by sample size. Cerebellar cortical pathology in ET was not homogeneously expressed across every case. It was possible to identify clusters of cases that differed with respect to the expression of postmortem features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.