Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989674›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

Phenotypic and genomic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Neha Parmar, Randhir Singh, Anuj Tyagi, Simranpreet Kaur, Anil Kumar Arora, Jatinder Paul Singh Gill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neha ParmarDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India.
Randhir SinghDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India. sainirandhir74@gmail.com.
Anuj TyagiDepartment of Aquatic Animal Health Management, College of Fisheries, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Simranpreet KaurDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India.
Anil Kumar AroraDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, 141004, Ludhiana, India.
Jatinder Paul Singh GillDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnterococcus faecalis has emerged as a significant nosocomial pathogen with increasing relevance at the human-animal interface. This study investigated the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and genomic characteristics of E. faecalis isolated from cattle farms in Punjab, India. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 288 samples, comprising cattle feces (239), cattle handler hand swabs (34), and handler stool samples (15), were processed using standard bacteriological protocols. Presumptive isolates were confirmed as E. faecalis by culture characteristics and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, and vancomycin resistance was confirmed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing. Resistance genes were screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and vancomycin-resistant isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for detailed genomic characterization. Overall, 51 E. faecalis isolates were recovered from 288 samples, yielding an overall prevalence of 17.70% (51/288). Sample-wise prevalence was 19.24% (46/239) in cattle feces, 8.82% (3/34) in hand swabs, and 13.33% (2/15) in stool samples. AST revealed high resistance rates to erythromycin (72.54%), linezolid (31.37%), ciprofloxacin and penicillin G (29.41% each), and tetracycline (27.45%). Phenotypic vancomycin resistance was identified in 5.88% (3/51) of isolates. PCR screening detected vanC1 in 31.37% and vanC2/C3 in 33.33% of isolates, although their presence was not uniformly associated with phenotypic resistance.WGS of three vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolates identified resistance genes, virulence determinants, and a shared multilocus sequence type (MLST), ST-387, among isolates from cattle and handlers.

conclusionsThese findings highlight cattle farms as reservoirs of multidrug resistant (MDR) and virulent E. faecalis strains, emphasizing the importance of genomic surveillance to prevent the dissemination of these strains into healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Enterococcus faecalisVancomycin ResistanceAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFecesGenome, BacterialGenomicsHumansIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhenotypeVancomycinWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinAntimicrobial resistanceE. faecalisMobile genetic elementsMultilocus sequence typingVirulence genesWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.