ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Canadian Treat-to-Target Practice Survey of Real-World Interventions and Strategies in Psoriasis (CAN TARGET PSORIASIS).
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTreat-to-target (T2T) strategies have been proposed to support decision-making in chronic plaque psoriasis care, but their use in Canadian clinical practice has not been well studied.
methodsThis retrospective chart review examined how Canadian T2T criteria are applied for adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and whether treatment decisions reflect treatment target achievement in clinical practice. Charts from 438 adults who initiated or modified biologic therapy and completed two visits 3-8 months apart were included. Treatment target achievement at visit 2 was assessed using predefined major and minor criteria, which included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) outcome measures.
resultsOf the 438 patients, 321 (73.3%) met the treatment target and 98.4% of these continued their current biologic therapy. Among the 117 patients who did not meet the treatment target, 48.7% of remained on their current biologic therapy. Treatment target achievement was associated with lower PASI, BSA, PGA, and DLQI scores. DLQI influenced treatment modification even when treatment targets were unmet. Switching between interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors was the most frequent treatment modification strategy.
conclusionFindings support the clinical value of Canadian T2T criteria, while highlighting the importance of shared decision-making. Many patients who did not meet treatment targets remained on their current biologic therapy, emphasizing the role of patient input, quality of life, and physician judgment. These results reinforce the importance of balancing treatment targets with individualized care in real-world plaque psoriasis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.