ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2026
Fragmented QRS complex in athletes' electrocardiogram: physiological adaptation or pathological sign? A scoping review.
Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFragmented QRS (fQRS) complex, characterized by notching/slurring in the QRS complex, has been linked with myocardial fibrosis and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in cardiomyopathies. While fQRS is a recognized arrhythmogenic marker in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, it is not included in the International Criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes.
methodsThis review aims to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of fQRS in athletes. This review was done according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. A search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies reporting fQRS in athletes across all age groups and sports discipline.
resultsA total of 7 studies were included in the final review, revealing higher prevalence of fQRS in older age groups, with the highest prevalence occurring in lead V1. Athletes with fQRS also experienced no adverse events on follow-ups.
conclusionsCurrent data suggests that isolated fQRS, especially in lead V1, is likely benign. However, fQRS in ≥ 2 contiguous leads warrant further investigations. A longer follow-up duration is needed to ascertain the possibilities of adverse events occurring in athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.