Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989615›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Anatomy-based individualised trocar placement in robotic pancreatic surgery: challenging the universal approach.

Pavel Záruba, Kristýna Pončáková, Štěpán-Ota Schütz, Eliška Kšírová, David Kachlík, Radek Pohnán, Michael Rousek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pavel ZárubaDepartment of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, Prague, 16900, Czech Republic.
Kristýna PončákováDepartment of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, Prague, 16900, Czech Republic. poncakova.kristyna@uvn.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9040-377X
Štěpán-Ota SchützDepartment of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, Prague, 16900, Czech Republic.
Eliška KšírováDepartment of Bioinformatics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
David KachlíkDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Radek PohnánDepartment of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, Prague, 16900, Czech Republic.
Michael RousekDepartment of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, Prague, 16900, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic pancreatic surgery has advanced considerably in recent years; however, morbidity and mortality remain significant. Improving outcomes requires standardised procedures with optimised perioperative settings. Proper positioning of robotic trocars plays a key role in enabling safe and effective surgical performance. This study evaluates the impact of anthropometric differences on trocar placement in robotic pancreatic surgery and assesses the feasibility of a universal trocar placement strategy. A retrospective analysis of 103 consecutive contrast-enhanced arterial-phase computed tomography scans was performed. Key distances between the target anatomy and surface landmarks, including the umbilicus and xiphoid process, were measured. The origin of the gastroduodenal artery was selected as the target anatomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy, while the origin of the celiac trunk served as the target anatomy for distal pancreatectomy. The analysis demonstrated that the widely adopted universal periumbilical trocar placement was unsuitable for a substantial proportion of patients. The target anatomy lay outside the recommended range (10–20 cm) in 24% of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy cases and in 9% of robotic distal pancreatectomy cases. Accordingly, we propose a simple method to optimise patient-tailored yet standardised trocar placement in robotic pancreatic procedures.

Indexed as

PancreasPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical InstrumentsAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedDistal pancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreatic surgeryRobotic surgeryTrocar placement

Identifiers

PMID41989615
PMCPMC13086756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.