Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989565›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging-based subtyping and prediction of treatment response and prognosis.

Maria El Homsi, Carl Sabottke, Charanjeet Singh, Carla Harmath, Bradley Spieler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria El HomsiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. elhomsim@mskcc.org.
Carl SabottkeSouthern Radiology Consultants, Baton Rouge, USA.
Charanjeet SinghDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA.
Carla HarmathUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Bradley SpielerUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy, accounting for nearly 90% of primary liver cancers worldwide. It is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with variable aggressiveness and treatment response. Imaging is central to the diagnosis and staging of HCC but offers limited insights into tumor biology. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics enable the extraction of quantitative imaging features from CT and MRI which can be used to assess tumor heterogeneity, predict response to therapy, and aid risk stratification. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that certain imaging features can aid in distinguishing HCC subtypes, raising the possibility that imaging could extend beyond diagnosis and staging to subtype classification. For example, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, corona enhancement, intratumoral arteries, peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase imaging, tumor in vein, and necrosis are associated with macrotrabecular-massive HCC. This review summarizes the current landscape of AI and radiomics in advancing imaging-based HCC assessment, specifically for HCC subtype classification and treatment response prediction and prognostication. Current progress, limitations, and future directions for integrating AI and radiomics into HCC management are also discussed.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceComputed tomographyHepatocellular carcinomaMacrotrabecular massive hepatocellular carcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingTreatment response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.