ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2026
Relevance of blood gas analysis in emergency medical services: an emergency physician's assessment.
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBlood gas analyses form part of routine testing in emergency medicine and intensive care in hospitals in the western world; however, this method has not yet become established in prehospital management, despite the fact that patients are comparable in terms of severity of the illnesses. This study aimed to assess whether the use of prehospital blood gas analysis has medical and/or organizational consequences for patient care.
methodsIn two regions in Germany, seven emergency physician-staffed response units were equipped with portable blood gas analysis devices. After each use, providers were required to complete a 6-item questionnaire evaluating potential medical and organizational consequences for the patient.
resultsA total of 184 patients underwent prehospital blood gas analysis. In 85% of cases, providers reported consequences for patient management, including medical and/or organizational effects.
conclusionIn the majority of cases, prehospital blood gas analysis influenced the care of critically ill patients. Further research is needed to determine whether its use translates into improved clinical outcomes, such as reduced mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41989559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.