Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989558›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2026

A Coast-to-Coast Assessment of Cumulative Impacts and Protection Potential in Canadian Marine Conservation Networks.

Grace E P Murphy, Selina Agbayani, Jocelyn C Nelson, Emily M Rubidge, Ryan R E Stanley, Cathryn C Murray, Noreen E Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grace E P MurphyBedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, Canada. Grace.Murphy@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.
Selina AgbayaniInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sidney, BC, Canada.
Jocelyn C NelsonPacific Biological Station, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
Emily M RubidgeInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sidney, BC, Canada.
Ryan R E StanleyBedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Cathryn C MurrayInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sidney, BC, Canada.
Noreen E KellyBedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of marine conservation networks depends on their ability to manage and safeguard against the many overlapping human activities and stressors influencing marine ecosystems. Cumulative impact mapping (CIM) combines information on the intensity and location of stressors with the spatial extent and vulnerability of marine habitats to generate a single, relative cumulative impact (CI) score. Despite its potential benefits to inform management and conservation efforts, CIM is not commonly incorporated into conservation network planning. Here, we combine published CIMs from the Canadian Atlantic and Pacific bioregions with existing marine conservation areas (MCAs) to compare impacts inside each MCA against regional impacts. We then conduct a scenario analysis to quantify potential reduction in cumulative impacts in two bioregion's proposed marine conservation networks by modeling the removal of prohibited activities (bottom contact fishing, dredging, disposal at sea) in alignment with the Canadian Marine Protection Standard. Both regions exhibited similar distributions in current CI scores, with approximately half of MCAs scoring significantly above the regional mean, and the other half below. The scenario analysis predicted a 7% mean decrease (range 0-36%) in cumulative impacts across the Scotian Shelf and 2% mean decrease (range 0-17%) across the Northern Shelf networks. We identified 17 MCAs in the Scotian Shelf and 8 in the Northern Shelf as having high protection potential, which can be a valuable decision support tool for conservation planners. We discuss how CIM can be operationalized for conservation network planning and management.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsCanadaEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringConservation planningCumulative effectsHuman activitiesMarine conservation networkMarine protected areaScenario analysis

Identifiers

PMID41989558
PMCPMC13086886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.