ArticleJournal of fluorescence2026
Ag-Doped ZnO Quantum Dots for Fluorescence-Based Detection of Trace Cr(VI) from River Water and Fish samples.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The co-precipitation process was used to create silver-doped zinc oxide. Fluorescence spectrophotometry, XRD, FT-IR, BET, TGA, and UV-Vis were used to characterize it. When stimulated at 360 nm, the Ag/ZnO QDs displayed intense fluorescence emission at 508 nm and were highly selective for Cr(VI). A calibration curve was plotted for different concentration levels of Cr(VI) ranging from 0 to 12 mg/L, with an R² value of 0.998 and the LOD and LOQ at 3.2 µg/L and 11 µg/L, respectively. Three concentration levels, 0.8, 5.6, and 10.4 mg/L, were used to examine the precision of the devised approach; relative standard deviation values did not surpass 5.4%, showing good reproducibility. By adding known quantities of Cr(VI) to the water and fish samples, the method’s recovery was assessed; the results ranged from 77.5% to 112.5%. Ultimately, the suggested approach demonstrated outstanding sensitivity, selectivity, and repeatability for the detection of Cr(VI) in fish and water samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.