ArticleNeuropsychology2026
Repeated presentation of a word list in a consistent order increases differences in total words recalled between those with and without Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIndividuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are known to have difficulty utilizing semantic strategy to remember items from a list, such as during word list recall tasks. However, it is unclear if presenting words in the same order as compared to shuffling across trials of a list-learning test confers an advantage in terms of word recall in individuals with AD.
methodTo address this issue, we leveraged data from 10,504 participants over five studies across four AD Research Centers that administered the Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD Word List Memory Test in either a standard sequence (shuffled words for each learning trial) or nonstandard sequence (unshuffled words in a consistent order for each learning trial).
resultsAfter controlling for gender, age, years of education, apolipoprotein E gene, Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score, and composite test scores for executive functioning and language comprehension, we found that differences in word recall performance between participants with and without probable AD were larger when they were tested with the unshuffled versus standard shuffled version of the word list.
conclusionsWhen administered the unshuffled Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD Word List, participants without AD demonstrated a larger recall advantage compared to those with probable AD. This advantage was higher on Trial 3 (β = 0.09) compared to Trial 2 (β = 0.04), suggesting that this advantage increases with multiple immediate repetitions. Using an unshuffled word list may enhance the ability to distinguish between individuals along the AD continuum. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.