Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989428›Full record

ArticleNursing education perspectives

Supporting Autonomy in ADL Care. How Nursing Students Learn in Theory Classes: A Qualitative Multi-Perspective Study.

Marjolein M C J Knibbeler, Stan Vluggen, Erik van Rossum, Sandra M G Zwakhalen, Petra M G Erkens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing education perspectives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marjolein M C J KnibbelerAbout the Authors Marjolein M. C. J. Knibbeler, MA, RN, Stan Vluggen, PhD, Erik van Rossum, PhD, Sandra M. G. Zwakhalen, PhD, are affiliated with Faculty of Healthcare, Academy of Nursing, Research Centre Community Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands. Marjolein M. C. J. Knibbeler, MA, RN, Erik van Rossum, PhD, Sandra M. G. Zwakhalen, PhD, Petra M. G. Erkens, PhD, are affiliated with Living Lab in Ageing and Long Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stan Vluggen
Erik van Rossum
Sandra M G Zwakhalen
Petra M G Erkens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis qualitative study examined how autonomy and autonomy support are addressed in the theoretical part of Dutch nursing education.

backgroundSupporting clients' autonomy in activities of daily living is essential for dignity and quality of life, but remains complex and often suboptimal due to contextual factors such as care settings, nurse-client relationships, and systemic pressures. Nurses must balance professional skills with sensitivity to clients' values. Little is known about how nursing students are prepared to support autonomy.

methodA document analysis of curricula and teaching materials was combined with interviews with 10 nursing students and 10 nurse educators.

resultsFindings show that autonomy is rarely mentioned in educational documents and lacks clear guidance. Teachers rely on personal experience, leading to inconsistent understanding among students, who mainly learn about autonomy support during internships.

conclusionBoth students and teachers suggest updating teaching materials and integrating best practices to strengthen education on autonomy support.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPersonal AutonomyStudents, NursingCurriculumEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateFemaleHumansNetherlandsQualitative ResearchAutonomy-Supportive BehaviorCurriculumNursing EducationNursing StudentsPersonal Autonomy

Identifiers

PMID41989428
PMCPMC13286109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.