ArticlePsychological services2026
Evolving standards for suicide risk documentation in the Veterans Health Administration: A brief commentary on Denneson et al. (2023).
Article in Psychological services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), a high risk for suicide (HRS) flag is used in medical records to alert providers that veterans have recently engaged in suicidal self-directed violence or required hospitalization to keep from doing so. These flags are not intended to indicate chronic suicide risk and thus are designed to be temporary. However, as risk for suicide is volatile and can confer a chronic course, it is common for veterans to engage in suicidal self-directed violence at intervals that extend beyond the life of a HRS flag. To improve our understanding of when it may be appropriate to inactivate a HRS flag, Denneson et al. (see record 2024-23207-001) recently analyzed factors associated with suicide reattempt following HRS flag inactivation. Beyond patient, provider, and system-level factors, the lone predictor of suicide reattempt in this sample was the quality of the note that documented the decision to inactive a HRS flag. In this commentary, we offer perspective from the field to contextualize the findings and implications introduced by Denneson et al. (2023). We discuss the limitations of the available data, which warrant empirical skepticism and caution against drawing firm conclusions without further study. We also provide an update on VHA's efforts to standardize documentation of the decision to inactivate HRS flags. Finally, we discuss the ever-evolving role of providers, suicide prevention programs, and VHA more broadly in preventing veteran suicide. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.