ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Glottal Area Waveform Measurements for Healthy Female and Male Speakers in Typical, High-Frequency, and Soft Phonation.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine vocal fold kinematic characteristics associated with typical-frequency and vocal-intensity, high-frequency, and soft-intensity phonation in vocally healthy adults.
methodGlottal area waveform (GAW) was measured from high-speed videoendoscopy in a total of 66 adults (41 women and 25 men) during sustained /i:/ production across the three tasks, resulting in a total of 594 phonations. Statistical analysis of glottal cycle quotients (open quotient [OQ], speed quotient [SQ], rate quotient [RQ], glottal gap index [GGI]), glottal cycle periodicity (amplitude, time periodicity [TP]), glottal cycle symmetry (phase asymmetry index, spatial symmetry index, amplitude symmetry index), normalized maximum area declination rate (MADRn), and amplitude-to-length ratio (ALR) was conducted. Principal component analysis was used to identify laryngeal strategies underlying the three tasks.
resultsHigh frequency and soft intensity resulted in changes in SQ, RQ, MADRn, and ALR in female participants, whereas in male participants, they impacted OQ, RQ, GGI, TP, MADRn, and ALR. High-frequency phonation is primarily achieved through increased cricothyroid muscle activity, while soft intensity is primarily achieved by reduced vocal fold adduction and subglottal pressure with compensatory cricothyroid activation.
conclusionHigh-frequency and soft-intensity phonations involve distinct laryngeal adjustments and clinically measurable, sex-dependent changes in GAW, highlighting the need to tailor voice therapy to physiological strategies and sex-based differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.