ArticleJournal of vision2026
Swiping colors in virtual reality: How stable are color category borders?
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Color discrimination in action: High-throughput measurement in immersive VR.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human color perception involves a tradeoff between our ability to discriminate millions of continuous hues and our reliance on a few discrete linguistic categories. Although some theories suggest these category boundaries are fixed perceptual anchors, others propose that judgments adapt dynamically to the statistical distribution of recent stimuli, known as the range effect. To test the stability of these boundaries, we adapted a fast-paced "match-to-sample" paradigm from animal learning into an immersive VR videogame. Participants used colored sabers to strike incoming cubes, matching saber color to the cube's stripe. We tested both the blue-green boundary (aligned with low-level cone mechanisms) and the pink-purple boundary (off-axis), using hue sets equated for discriminability. After establishing baseline category borders using psychometric functions, we shifted the range of tested colors toward one category endpoint to determine if the internal border remained stable or shifted with the stimulus distribution. Across four experiments, results consistently revealed a partial shift. Rather than remaining invariant, category borders shifted systematically in the direction of the stimulus range shift. Further manipulations demonstrated that this partial shift was unaffected by the proportion of responses and occurred even when using hues which don't contain a category boundary. These findings indicate that under rapid decision-making conditions, observers' judgments are strongly influenced by the statistical structure of the immediate stimulus set, with stable categorical anchors playing a more limited role. This suggests a limited role for linguistic color categories in active, matching-based tasks, where observers likely prioritize automatic statistical adaptation over fixed categorical distinctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.