Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989088›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2026

Engaging youth in systems thinking for active recreation: piloting a Collective Intelligence approach.

Jiani Ma, David Cao, Michael Hogan, Kristy A Bolton, Jo Salmon, Maja Vilhelmsen, Harriet Koorts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiani MaInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-5891
David CaoCentre for Multicultural Youth, 304 Drummond St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Michael HoganSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Kristy A BoltonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.
Jo SalmonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.
Maja VilhelmsenDepartment of Prevention, Health Promotion and Community Care, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juels Vej, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Harriet KoortsInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.

Funding

Faculty of Health, Deakin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Youth active recreation is influenced by complex interactions among factors in the active recreation system. Systems approaches can help identify ways to intervene; however, young people are rarely involved in this process. This study piloted the use of Collective Intelligence (CI), a participatory systems approach, to engage young people in identifying barriers to active recreation and co-creating solutions. Three CI workshops were conducted in Victoria, Australia, involving nine participants aged 12-17. In each workshop, participants generated and prioritized barriers, co-created systems maps, and collaboratively designed solutions aligned to the mapped systems. Field notes captured reflections on facilitation and youth engagement. Across workshops, 48 barriers were identified and grouped into eight categories: Shyness and social skills, Lack of support, Financial, Time, Space and equipment, Public Transport, Safety, and Medical. Participants then co-created solutions across individual (n = 5), community (n = 11), and government (n = 5) levels. Individual-level strategies focused on enhancing social skills; community-level ideas focused on public transport and inclusive spaces; Government actions included subsidies for extracurricular activities. Reflections highlight the value of CI to engage young people in articulating interconnected influences in their lived experience with active recreation. Key strengths of the process included making complexity visible and actionable. Challenges included uncertainty of upstream issues, uneven participant engagement, conflation of terms, and maintaining focus. This study offers actionable strategies to potentially overcome these challenges for anyone who wants to engage young people in systems thinking. The inclusion of a youth researcher was valuable in supporting young people to contribute their ideas.

Indexed as

ExerciseRecreationSystems AnalysisAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSocial SkillsVictoriaadolescentparticipatory methodsphysical activitysystems thinkingyouth

Identifiers

PMID41989088
PMCPMC13089555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.