ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Engaging youth in systems thinking for active recreation: piloting a Collective Intelligence approach.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youth active recreation is influenced by complex interactions among factors in the active recreation system. Systems approaches can help identify ways to intervene; however, young people are rarely involved in this process. This study piloted the use of Collective Intelligence (CI), a participatory systems approach, to engage young people in identifying barriers to active recreation and co-creating solutions. Three CI workshops were conducted in Victoria, Australia, involving nine participants aged 12-17. In each workshop, participants generated and prioritized barriers, co-created systems maps, and collaboratively designed solutions aligned to the mapped systems. Field notes captured reflections on facilitation and youth engagement. Across workshops, 48 barriers were identified and grouped into eight categories: Shyness and social skills, Lack of support, Financial, Time, Space and equipment, Public Transport, Safety, and Medical. Participants then co-created solutions across individual (n = 5), community (n = 11), and government (n = 5) levels. Individual-level strategies focused on enhancing social skills; community-level ideas focused on public transport and inclusive spaces; Government actions included subsidies for extracurricular activities. Reflections highlight the value of CI to engage young people in articulating interconnected influences in their lived experience with active recreation. Key strengths of the process included making complexity visible and actionable. Challenges included uncertainty of upstream issues, uneven participant engagement, conflation of terms, and maintaining focus. This study offers actionable strategies to potentially overcome these challenges for anyone who wants to engage young people in systems thinking. The inclusion of a youth researcher was valuable in supporting young people to contribute their ideas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.