ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2026
Early multidimensional mobility assessments for discriminating discharge-level ambulation and functional independence in subacute stroke inpatients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine whether early multidimensional mobility assessments discriminate independent ambulation and functional independence on discharge in subacute stroke inpatients with supervised walking ability.
designRetrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Fifty subacute stroke inpatients (≤ 5 months post-stroke).
methodsIndependent ambulation and functional independence were defined as Functional Ambulation Category ≥ 4 and Modified Barthel Index 75 on discharge, respectively. Discriminative ability of admission assessments was evaluated using univariate binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
resultsThe Berg Balance Scale and the modified Four Square Step Test demonstrated the highest discriminative performance. For independent ambulation, the Berg Balance Scale (≥ 40.5) yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.88) with 82% accuracy, and the modified Four Square Step Test (≤ 31.52 s) yielded an area under the curve of 0.78 (0.64-0.91) with 80% accuracy. For functional independence, the Berg Balance Scale (≥ 42.5) yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (0.60-0.88) with 74% accuracy, and the modified Four Square Step Test (≤ 32.88 s) yielded an area under the curve of 0.71 (0.57-0.86) with 70% accuracy.
conclusionEarly balance and multidirectional stepping performance may be useful for screening to support goal-setting and discharge planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.