Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Alternative Rule-Out Cutoffs for a Novel High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00470587 (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation (APACE) Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is major uncertainty among physicians on how to best use the novel hs-cTnI (high sensitivity-cardiac troponin I)-VITROS assay, as the limit of quantification (2 ng/L), applied by the US Food and Drug Administration and other regulators, is higher than the limit of detection (1 ng/L)-based rule-out cutoffs from recent pilot studies for 0/1-hour and 0/2-hour algorithms.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter study aimed to derive and validate higher limit of quantification-based assay-specific cutoffs for safe and efficient rule-out of myocardial infarction among adult patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department. Final diagnoses of myocardial infarction were centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists, blinded to hs-cTnI-VITROS concentrations.
resultsAmong 2931 eligible patients, 467 (16%) were diagnosed with myocardial infarction. In the derivation cohort (n=1466), a cutoff ≤2 ng/L at presentation in patients with chest pain onset >3 hours (direct rule-out) and ≤2 ng/L in combination with a 1-hour absolute change of ≤1 ng/L ruled out 51% of patients, with a sensitivity of 99.1% (96.9%-99.8%). Predefined rule-in thresholds (0 hour-value ≥40 ng/L [direct rule-in] or an absolute change within 1 hour of ≥4 ng/L) identified 16.9% of patients, with a specificity of 95.9% (94.7%-96.9%). Very high sensitivity and specificity were confirmed in the validation cohort (n=1465). Comparable findings were observed for the alternative 0/2-hour algorithm with ≤2 ng/L as the rule-out threshold.
conclusionsThe alternative 0/1-hour and 0/2-hour algorithms using limit of quantification-based rule-out cutoffs of ≤2 ng/L with the hs-cTnI-VITROS assay demonstrated very high safety and efficacy in suspected myocardial infarction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; Identifier: NCT00470587.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.