ReviewHistopathology2026
Understanding cholangiocarcinoma: molecular landscape, pathological classification, and challenges in biopsy diagnosis.
Review in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterization of molecular features of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has questioned the traditional, anatomy-based classification scheme and has alternatively suggested biology-based classifications. Intrahepatic CCA has been classified into small-duct and large-duct types, and the latter is histologically and molecularly almost identical to perihilar CCA. Although distal and perihilar CCA have been classified together, they have different molecular abnormalities, with MDM2 amplification observed in 15% of perihilar CCA cases but in none of the distal CCA cases. FGFR2 and IDH1 are two main drug targets in small-duct intrahepatic CCA, and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is most common in small-duct intrahepatic CCA. In contrast, HER2 is a promising target for extrahepatic CCA and gallbladder cancer, as HER2 overexpression is seen in 17%-30% of cases. Classification of intrahepatic CCA is often challenging on biopsy specimens; however, recognition of pitfalls (e.g., hybrid morphology) will help avoid misclassification. Staining for ancillary markers, including CRP, albumin-ISH, and S100P, is also useful. Accurate distinction between distal CCA and pancreatic head cancer has become increasingly important, particularly in unresectable or borderline resectable cases, as systemic treatment strategies differ between these entities. Although these two neoplasms share many morphological and immunohistochemical features, the presence of clear or foamy cancer cells in biopsy specimens is uncommon in dCCA and may favour pancreatic ductal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.