ArticleHistopathology2026
Immunophenotypic assessment of pure embryonal carcinoma and yolk sac tumour suggests that reprogramming to non-seminoma occurs outside the spermatogonial niche.
Article in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsGerm cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) is the precursor of GCNIS-derived testicular germ cell tumours, including seminomas and non-seminomas. Most non-seminomas show mixed histology, often including components of seminoma. A small subset presents as pure non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. In these neoplasms, the absence of invasive seminoma. raises the possibility that reprogramming to non-seminoma may occur at an early in-situ stage (i.e., within the spermatogonial niche). This study examined GCNIS associated with pure embryonal carcinoma (EC) and postpubertal-type yolk sac tumour (YST) using immunohistochemistry for transcription factors characteristic of GCNIS/seminoma, EC, and YST phenotypes to determine if reprogramming to non-seminoma occurs within the spermatogonial niche.
methodsGCNIS associated with pure testicular YST and EC was assessed using OCT4, FOXA2 (only YST), CD30 (only EC), SOX2 (only EC), SOX17, and NANOG immunohistochemistry. Adjacent foci of intratubular and invasive tumour were also evaluated, if present.
resultsSixty-seven pure non-seminomas (63 EC, 4 YST) were evaluated. In all cases, GCNIS expressed OCT4, SOX17, and NANOG. GCNIS associated with EC was consistently negative for CD30 and SOX2, and GCNIS associated with YST was consistently negative for FOXA2. Adjacent invasive EC (62/67 cases) and intratubular EC (19/67) showed the classic EC immunophenotype: OCT4+/NANOG+/SOX17-/SOX2+/CD30+. Similarly, invasive YST adjacent to GCNIS was OCT4-/NANOG-/SOX17+/FOXA2+.
conclusionsAssessment of transcription factors involved in the induction and maintenance of EC and YST phenotypes suggests that, in pure non-seminomas, reprogramming occurs outside the spermatogonial niche.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.