SynthesisActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Risks of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Orthopaedic Surgery. A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.
Synthesis in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended for perioperative analgesic treatment. However, NSAID treatment may be associated with increased risk of adverse events. We investigated the risks of serious adverse events with perioperative NSAID treatment in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022342003) of randomised clinical trials assessing the harmful effects associated with the use of NSAIDs versus placebo, usual care, or no intervention in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We systematically searched for eligible trials up to October 13, 2025. We performed risk of bias assessments to account for systematic errors, Trial Sequential Analysis to account for the risks of random errors, performed meta-analyses using R, and used The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of the evidence.
resultsWe included 38 trials enrolling 6593 patients for our primary outcome. Most trials were of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between NSAID and placebo for risk of serious adverse events, RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.14; p = 0.26; very low certainty of evidence. Post hoc beta-binomial regression sensitivity analyses, including trials with zero events, indicated no difference in risks of serious adverse events between NSAID and placebo (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.06; p = 0.19). Trial Sequential Analysis showed that insufficient information was obtained to confirm or reject a relative risk change of 25%.
conclusionIn adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, we found no evidence of a difference between NSAID and placebo regarding risk of serious adverse events. However, the available data were insufficient to draw firm conclusions, and the certainty of evidence was generally very low. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This systematic review with meta-analysis was aimed at assessing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatments for reported serious adverse effects in post-operative analgesia trials in orthopedic surgical cohorts. These drugs are routinely part of modern multimodal or pre-emptive analgesia treatment routines. The published evidence was generelly assessed to have a high risk of bias or low certainty for this specific question. No clear difference in reported event risk between this type of drug and placebo was found, though it is not clear that this is conclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.