Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41988597›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Simulation-Based Training for Emergency Department Flow Management: A Dual-Site Experience With GridlockED in France.

Edouard Lansiaux, Evelyne Guerif Dubreucq, Teresa M Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edouard LansiauxEmergency Medicine, Lille University Hospital, Lille, FRA.
Evelyne Guerif DubreucqEmergency Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, FRA.
Teresa M ChanEmergency Medicine, Toronto Metropolitan University, William Osler Health Systems, Brampton, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Emergency department overcrowding and flow management remain critical challenges worldwide, demanding not only clinical expertise but also robust non-technical skills such as teamwork, communication, and systems thinking. Material and methods This program evaluation describes two workshops conducted during major French medical conferences in 2025, using the GridlockED tabletop simulation game as an interactive educational tool for healthcare professionals. A total of 46 participants with diverse professional backgrounds and experience levels completed post-session surveys assessing satisfaction, perceived realism, language accessibility, and self-reported learning gains across five competencies related to emergency department flow management. Results Results indicated high overall satisfaction and meaningful perceived learning, particularly in identifying operational barriers, though team communication emerged as the lowest-rated skill. The English-language format represented a moderate barrier for French-speaking participants, highlighting the need for linguistic adaptation. Conclusions These findings support the potential of tabletop simulation games as accessible, scalable training tools for enhancing emergency department flow management competencies in non-English-speaking healthcare contexts.

Indexed as

crisis leadershipemergency departmentflow managementgridlockedsimulationteam communication

Identifiers

PMID41988597
PMCPMC13077383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.