ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Differential regulation of monocyte oxidative burst by isoniazid in healthy and latent tuberculosis-infected subjects.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential Regulation of Oxidative Burst by First Line Drugs Used Against Multi Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Naïve Human Innate Immune Cells.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Isoniazid (INH), a first-line drug for tuberculosis, exerts bactericidal effects through inhibition of mycolic acid synthesis. However, its potential to modulate host immunity remains unclear. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are critical antimicrobial effectors produced by innate immune cells, and their regulation is essential for effective immune signalling and pathogen clearance, whereas excessive ROS can contribute to inflammation and tissue damage. This duality makes it important to determine whether INH modifies ROS production in innate immune cells, particularly in individuals with latent infection. Methods: We investigated whether INH affects ROS production in circulating immune cells and plasma cytokines in healthy controls and LTBI individuals before treatment initiation (n = 9 per group). Whole blood was incubated with INH at plasma concentrations observed in humans (2, 4.5, and 10.5 μg/mL). Intracellular ROS production in neutrophils, eosinophils, and monocytes was quantified using flow cytometry with the oxidation-sensitive probe DHR-123, following stimulation with fMLP, Results: In healthy controls, INH induced a significant reduction in ROS production in monocytes (median values of DHR+ classical monocytes after Discussion: These findings suggest that INH dose-dependently downregulates monocyte ROS production in healthy individuals, whereas LTBI individuals exhibit an diminished ROS response compared to healthy controls that is not further affected by INH. This work provides new insight into the immunomodulatory properties of INH and highlights the need to consider host responses, such as ROS production, in optimizing TB treatment and adjunctive therapy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.