ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Mapping the rehabilitation journey of patients with traumatic brain injury in China: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation involves a complex, multi-stage journey across various healthcare settings. However, current research still lacks a comprehensive understanding of this process from the patient's perspective. A detailed mapping of the patient journey is crucial for designing targeted and effective rehabilitation strategies. Design: A qualitative interpretative research design was performed and the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR) has been used. Objective: To construct a patient journey map visualizing the rehabilitation care experiences of adult TBI patients, identify key pain points and service gaps, and provide recommendations for service optimization. Methods: A qualitative interpretative research design was employed, guided by the Patient-Centered Healthcare Accessibility Framework. Using purposive sampling, 26 TBI patients were recruited from five healthcare settings in a major Chinese city between February and July 2024. Data were collected through 78 semi-structured interviews and 156 h of non-participant observation across acute care, rehabilitation, and community settings. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework, followed by process mapping and journey visualization. Results: The TBI rehabilitation journey comprised three distinct phases: Acute Treatment Phase (2-8 weeks), Continuous Rehabilitation Phase (3-18 months), and Rehabilitation Community Integration Phase (ongoing). Nine emotional states were identified throughout the journey, ranging from fear and helplessness in the acute phase to acceptance and hope in the community integration phase. Thirteen core rehabilitation needs were prioritized across phases. Nineteen significant pain points were categorized into system-level ( Conclusion: The TBI rehabilitation journey is characterized by complexity, non-linearity, and significant service fragmentation. Findings highlight the urgent need for integrated, patient-centered care models with enhanced care coordination, standardized pathways, and comprehensive family support systems. The patient journey map provides a framework for systematic service improvement and policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.