ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
County- and State-level Estimates of Population Sizes of Men Who Have Sex With Men Across the United States.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate estimates of the population sizes of men who have sex with men (MSM) are essential for evaluating HIV-related interventions. We aimed to estimate MSM populations at county and state levels using recent data from the decennial census and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Methods: We used 2020 Decennial Census data to calculate a weight for each U.S. county, reflecting the proportion of male-male partner households relative to counties of similar urbanicity based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We applied these weights to urbanicity-stratified estimates of the prevalence of adult men who reported sex with a man in the past 12 months, derived from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2020). Multiplying these percentages by adult male populations produced county estimates, which were aggregated to state levels. Results: We estimated approximately 2.1 million MSM in the United States, representing 1.7% of adult males. State-level estimates ranged from 0.3% in Wyoming (n = 675) to 3.7% in the District of Columbia (n = 9709). California had the largest MSM population (n = 318 612; 2.1%), followed by Florida (n = 191 199; 2.3%) and Texas (n = 173 751; 1.6%). At the county level, Los Angeles County, CA, had the largest MSM population (n = 82 513; 2.1%), followed by Cook County, IL (n = 39 580; 2.0%), and Broward County, FL (n = 34 321; 4.7%). Broward County, FL (4.7%), and San Francisco County, CA (4.6%), had the highest proportions relative to their male populations. Conclusions: County- and state-level MSM estimates provide crucial denominators for calculating disease rates and informing public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.