ArticleHumanities & social sciences communications2026
Principles for ethical research in the Himalayas: Decolonising research ethics across the disciplines.
Article in Humanities & social sciences communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research in the Himalayan region has long been shaped by uneven power relations, driven by extractive academic practices, global conservation agendas, and development interventions. Although often unintentional, these approaches have tended to prioritise data collection over reciprocal relationships, producing knowledge that benefits external actors while silencing or marginalising local perspectives and communities. In this paper, I propose a framework for ethical research that centres the agency, knowledge systems, and material realities of Himalayan communities and ecologies. Drawing from community-based and decolonial methodologies, this framework identifies six ethical principles designed to guide researchers in establishing collaborative, respectful, and non-extractive relationships with local peoples and ecologies. These principles include: (1) community collaboration from the outset, (2) Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, (3) knowledge co-production, (4) protection of situated cultural and ecological knowledges, (5) benefit sharing and reciprocity, and (6) long-term commitment and accountability. These principles extend beyond the social sciences, humanities and arts, requiring that all researchers, including those in STEM, environmental monitoring and natural sciences, address how their work risks reproducing colonial and epistemic asymmetries of power through extractive data practices and surveillance, including instrument deployment and sample collection, which can be perceived as acts of academic or institutional territorial claim-making. The paper also discusses the challenges and considerations required for operationalising ethical research principles. By focusing on local authority, lived ecological conditions, and knowledge sovereignty, this paper presents an ethical model for research that challenges extractivism and centres relational responsibility. It urges scholars, institutions, and funders to acknowledge the contested terrains of knowledge and power in which Himalayan communities are embedded-and to respond accordingly with care, humility, and commitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.