ReviewOTO open
Does Electrical Stimulation Therapy Influence Synkinesis in Facial Paralysis? A Systematic Review.
Review in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peripheral facial palsy: contemporary advances and unresolved debates in management from pathogenic mechanisms to tailored reconstruction.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Facial paralysis (FP) has aesthetic, social, and functional consequences. While electrical stimulation (ES) shows promise for peripheral nerve injury, its role in FP remains controversial due to concerns about increasing synkinesis. Data Sources: A literature review was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Review Methods: Included studies evaluated the incidence or severity of synkinesis after ES in FP patients. Extracted data included demographics, ES parameters, FP etiology, synkinesis outcomes, and treatment duration. Results: Of 601 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria, comprising 243 patients (92 female, reported in 5 studies). Bell's palsy was the most common FP etiology (76.5%), followed by iatrogenic facial nerve injury (20.2%). Time to treatment ranged from 1 week to 7 years post-onset. Treatment durations varied from 2 weeks to 29 months, with inter-impulse gaps of 30 to 3000 milliseconds, phase durations of 10 to 700 milliseconds, and amplitudes of 0.5 to 27 mA. All ES was transcutaneous. Three of 5 studies reported no differences in synkinesis scores between ES and control groups. Two studies found no differences in synkinesis incidence. Only one study showed reduced synkinesis in the ES group. Conclusions: This study represents an up-to-date review of synkinesis in FP patients receiving ES. Evidence suggests a benefit in overall facial function for patients without significant additional risk of synkinesis. Inconsistencies in synkinesis outcomes and measurement underscore the need for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.