Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41988305›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

Second primary malignancy risk after thymic epithelial tumors: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis integrating multiple primary-standardized incidence ratio and competing-risk models.

Jun-Nan Hu, Xiang Zhuang, Jun Peng, Hao Rong, Xin Gao, Nian Xu, Qing-Jie Chen, Ke Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jun-Nan HuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6520-3638
Xiang ZhuangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jun PengDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hao RongDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xin GaoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Nian XuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qing-Jie ChenDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ke MaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare, but with improving survival, second primary malignancies (SPM) are an emerging concern. This study aimed to characterize the overall, site-specific, and latency-dependent risk of SPM after TETs and to identify clinical predictors using multiple primary-standardized incidence ratio and competing-risk models. Methods: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 registries (2000-2022), we identified patients with microscopically confirmed TETs. Multiple primary-standardized incidence ratio (MP-SIR) analyses in SEER*Stat were used to compare observed SPM in TETs survivors with expected numbers based on age-, sex-, race- and calendar year-specific incidence rates in the general U.S. population. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified by histology, cancer site, and latency interval. Fine-Gray competing-risk models were used to assess clinical predictors of SPM. Results: Among 5,849 patients with TETs, 590 (10.1%) developed an SPM. The incidence rate of SPM among TETs survivors in our cohort was 2,034.6 per 100,000 person-years, far exceeding that of the general population (80.4 per 100,000 person-years). Significantly elevated SIRs were observed for SPM arising in the respiratory, endocrine, urinary, digestive, and lymphoid/hematopoietic systems. Age >60 years, thymoma histology, receipt of surgery, and absence of chemotherapy were each independently associated with a higher risk of SPM. Notably, patients who developed SPM had better overall survival than those who did not. Conclusions: TETs survivors have a clearly increased and persistent risk of SPM, with risk magnitude and patterns differing across histologic subtypes and organ sites.

Indexed as

competing risk analysissecond primary malignancies (SPM)Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER database)Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs)

Identifiers

PMID41988305
PMCPMC13077246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.