ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Second primary malignancy risk after thymic epithelial tumors: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis integrating multiple primary-standardized incidence ratio and competing-risk models.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare, but with improving survival, second primary malignancies (SPM) are an emerging concern. This study aimed to characterize the overall, site-specific, and latency-dependent risk of SPM after TETs and to identify clinical predictors using multiple primary-standardized incidence ratio and competing-risk models. Methods: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 registries (2000-2022), we identified patients with microscopically confirmed TETs. Multiple primary-standardized incidence ratio (MP-SIR) analyses in SEER*Stat were used to compare observed SPM in TETs survivors with expected numbers based on age-, sex-, race- and calendar year-specific incidence rates in the general U.S. population. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified by histology, cancer site, and latency interval. Fine-Gray competing-risk models were used to assess clinical predictors of SPM. Results: Among 5,849 patients with TETs, 590 (10.1%) developed an SPM. The incidence rate of SPM among TETs survivors in our cohort was 2,034.6 per 100,000 person-years, far exceeding that of the general population (80.4 per 100,000 person-years). Significantly elevated SIRs were observed for SPM arising in the respiratory, endocrine, urinary, digestive, and lymphoid/hematopoietic systems. Age >60 years, thymoma histology, receipt of surgery, and absence of chemotherapy were each independently associated with a higher risk of SPM. Notably, patients who developed SPM had better overall survival than those who did not. Conclusions: TETs survivors have a clearly increased and persistent risk of SPM, with risk magnitude and patterns differing across histologic subtypes and organ sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.