ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
NODRAIN study protocol: a non-interventional, prospective study for evaluating the effectiveness of intraoperative ventilation for the prediction of postoperative air leak in major pulmonary resections by conventional or robotic thoracoscopy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07350265 (Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intraoperative Ventilation for Predicting Postoperative Air Leaks During Major Lung Resections by Conventional or Robotic Thoracoscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intraoperative Ventilation for Predicting Postoperative Air Leaks During Major Lung Resections by Conventional or Robotic Thoracoscopy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Air leak remains the most common complication following thoracic surgery, despite advances in minimally invasive techniques, and the main reason for chest tube drainage after major lung resections. The chest tube is associated with increased postoperative pain and, therefore, increased postoperative complications. Nevertheless, there are some patients who will not experience air leak after a major pulmonary resection. These patients may therefore not be drained, and the postoperative pain could be consequently dramatically less. Preliminary evidence suggests that intraoperative air leak measurement via mechanical ventilator may predict postoperative air leak, but current data are insufficient for clinical implementation. The objective of this study is to identify the threshold of air leak rate recorded by the mechanical ventilator device at the end of the intervention, below which there will be no air leaks during spontaneous breathing, after extubation of the patient. Methods: This is a non-interventional, prospective, single-center, and single-cohort study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative ventilation for the prediction of postoperative air leakage after major lung resections. The study will enroll a minimum of 50 adults undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy via conventional or robotic thoracoscopy. All participants will receive standard intraoperative ventilation for leak detection and routine postoperative drainage. The primary analysis will assess concordance between intraoperative and postoperative measurements using Passing-Bablok regression and Pearson correlation. Secondary analyses will include Cohen's Kappa for analysis of agreement between the two techniques, and evaluation of postoperative outcomes (duration of drainage, hospital stay, complications, and re-drainage rates). Discussion: This study aims to provide preliminary evidence supporting intraoperative ventilator-based leak measurement as a predictive tool for postoperative air leak, potentially enabling targeted non-drainage strategies after major lung resection, reducing postoperative pain and complications, shortening hospitalization, and lowering healthcare costs. Trial Registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07350265) on 20 January 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.