ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
The impact of perfusate filtration or exchange on lung function during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP): a systematic review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) supports assessment and rehabilitation of donor lungs. It runs as a closed circuit, so electrolytes and metabolites accumulate over the duration of perfusion. This systematic review investigates the impact of various dialysis or perfusate exchange (PE) techniques on electrolyte balance, inflammation and lung function during EVLP. Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Embase was conducted from database inception to September 17, 2025. We included all articles describing human or animal studies that tested dialysis or PE during EVLP. Outcomes included electrolytes, lactate, pH, edema formation, lung performance characteristics, and inflammatory markers. Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria, one human and four porcine models, with a total of 57 subjects. Across studies, dialysis consistently improved solute clearance, lowering sodium, potassium, and chloride, while increasing calcium and glucose, reducing lactate accumulation, and maintaining physiologic pH. PE did not sustain physiologic pH and had limited impact on electrolyte homeostasis, with only transient effects on lactate. No differences were observed in lung function parameters including oxygenation, compliance, and airway pressure. Pro-inflammatory cytokine production was largely unchanged, however, interleukin (IL)-10 was elevated with dialysis in several studies. Conclusion: During EVLP, dialysis stabilized acid-base status and metabolites. These biochemical gains did not translate into consistent improvements in oxygenation or compliance. Smaller dialysis membranes were associated with higher pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and increased cytokine profile. Future studies should extend EVLP duration with perfusate clearance to evaluate whether perfusate clearance strategies provide additional benefits with longer duration preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.