ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Estimating nasal nitric oxide from measured fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is an effective screening indicator for primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) and a potential biomarker for nasal diseases; however, Measurement of nNO using standard methods is not available everywhere. Therefore, we aimed to estimate nNO values from measured fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) and nasal FeNO (nFeNO) levels using a widely used FeNO analyzer. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, the proportion of NO from the lower airway mixed with nFeNO was calculated by simultaneously measuring nFeNO and nNO in 15 healthy participants. Additionally, nNO values were estimated from the measured FeNO and nFeNO in healthy controls and patients with asthma or PCD. Results: The average rate of mixed NO from the lower airway tract was 0.86±0.04. Assuming NO to be 0.86, nNO estimated from the measured FeNO and nFeNO was 329.1±127.8 and 313.4±203.7 parts per billion (ppb) in healthy participants (n=53) and patients with asthma (n=19), respectively. Among patients with asthma, no significant difference was observed in the estimated nNO values between patients with and without peripheral blood eosinophilia; however, the nNO-FeNO ratio was significantly lower in those with eosinophilia. The estimated nNO value in four of eight patients with PCD was <77 nL/min and was used as a cutoff used to identify patients with PCD. Conclusions: The estimated nNO value, which is derived from the average rate of NO contamination from the lower respiratory tract, may be a possible substitute for nNO and can be measured with instruments that are widely used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.