ArticleNeurology. Genetics2026
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic Diagnosis in Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize clinical features, genetic architecture, treatment responses, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonatal epilepsy associated with Methods: We conducted a retrospective, two-center study of 30 neonates from 2019 to 2024. All patients underwent whole-exome sequencing with Sanger confirmation and, at last follow-up, were classified, according to International League Against Epilepsy criteria as having self-limited (familial) neonatal epilepsy (SeL[F]NE) or developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). Primary outcomes were seizure freedom by 6 months and milestone-based three-level neurodevelopment (normal/mild/severe). Clinical/EEG/MRI features and variant class/topology were compared across phenotypes. Results: Most infants presented in the first week of life (median 3 days), typically with focal tonic seizures. EEG abnormalities were common (90%); burst-suppression/profound discontinuity consistently signaled adverse neurodevelopment. MRI was often normal (53%) or nonspecific. We identified 29 distinct variants (32 occurrences) across 30 patients. Twenty-eight carried a single heterozygous variant, and 2 carried 2 heterozygous variants (phase not determined); missense variants predominated (21/30, 70%). Clear topology-phenotype patterns emerged: transmembrane missense variants-especially S5-pore-S6-were enriched in DEE, whereas C-terminal/nontransmembrane variants were associated with SeL(F)NE and benign outcomes. At the last follow-up, SeL(F)NE accounted for 63% and DEE 37%. Seizure freedom reached 93%. Oxcarbazepine was often associated with seizure control after phenobarbital nonresponse, but this observational signal should not be interpreted as causal. Neurodevelopment was normal in 63%; delays occurred only within the DEE cohort. All 5 single-allele truncating/NMD lesions (CNV deletion, canonical splice-site, 2 nonsense, 1 frameshift) aligned with SeL(F)NE, whereas the 2 individuals with 2 heterozygous variants were classified as DEE with marked impairment; however, phase was not determined and 1 recurrent variant (p.E515D) was classified as likely benign, precluding inference of 2 pathogenic alleles. Discussion:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.