ArticleProceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society2025
Principles and Policy Recommendations for Comprehensive Genetic Data Governance.
Article in Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening legal safeguards against genetic discrimination: review and recommendations for Malaysia.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- Geneticization in the genomic era: a scoping review of ethical, clinical, and sociocultural transformations.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic data collection has become ubiquitous, producing genetic information about health, ancestry, and social traits. However, unregulated use-especially amid evolving scientific understanding-poses serious privacy and discrimination risks. These risks are intensified by advancing AI, particularly multi-modal systems integrating genetic, clinical, behavioral, and environmental data. In this work, we organize the uses of genetic data along four distinct 'pillars', and develop a risk assessment framework that identifies key values any governance system must preserve. In doing so, we draw on current privacy scholarship concerning contextual integrity, data relationality, and the Belmont principle. We apply the framework to four real-world case studies and identify critical gaps in existing regulatory frameworks and specific threats to privacy and personal liberties, particularly through genetic discrimination. Finally, we offer three policy recommendations for genetic data governance that safeguard individual rights in today's under-regulated ecosystem of large-scale genetic data collection and usage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.