ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Case Report: Two cases of primary malignant melanoma of the female genital tract and literature review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix (PMMC) is an exceptionally rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, there are no standardized treatment guidelines. This case report presents two patients with PMMC, contributing to the literature through a novel treatment approach and literature review. Both patients presented with vaginal bleeding: one postmenopausal without obvious cervical pigmentation, the other premenopausal with a brown, friable cervical mass. Histopathology confirmed PMMC in both. The first patient underwent radical surgery without adjuvant therapy and died from recurrence 36 months later. The second patient received radical surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and bevacizumab maintenance, followed by a combination of carboplatin, dacarbazine, and Tislelizumab for pulmonary metastases, achieving significant tumor regression after two cycles. A review of nine reported cases treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors revealed that radical surgery was performed in 90% of patients, yet 80% did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and most (80%) still experienced disease progression with immunotherapy, underscoring its limited efficacy. PD-L1 expression, assessed in only three cases (all negative), did not reliably predict response. In conclusion, PMMC remains a formidable clinical challenge with high recurrence rates despite surgery. Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is inconsistent, but multimodal strategies integrating surgery, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, and immunotherapy may offer clinical benefit and warrant further investigation to improve outcomes in this aggressive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.