Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41988135›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Multimodal analgesia strategies enhance postoperative recovery and mitigate inflammatory responses in women undergoing elective surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Yanhong Tang, Yumei He, Hai Yang, Hongyan Li, Anqiong Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanhong Tang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yumei He *Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Hai YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Hongyan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Anqiong MaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with rising global incidence attributed to population aging, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment, but perioperative pain management remains challenging. Traditional opioid-centric regimens are effective for acute pain but are associated with adverse effects that can hinder recovery and potentially compromise oncologic outcomes. Multimodal analgesia, integrating non-opioid agents and regional techniques, is increasingly advocated but lacks disease-specific, large-scale comparative evidence in gynecologic oncology. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Southwest China, including 650 women undergoing elective surgery for histologically confirmed endometrial cancer between January 2020 and January 2025. Patients were stratified into four groups according to perioperative analgesic regimens: (1) opioid-dominant IV PCA, (2) opioid-sparing plus NSAIDs, (3) epidural/regional adjunct, and (4) fully multimodal analgesia (regional, NSAIDs/acetaminophen, reduced opioids). Co-primary outcomes were prolonged hospitalization (>7 days) and any postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher). Secondary endpoints included pain scores, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to first ambulation/flatus, and perioperative immune-inflammatory markers (NLR, CRP). Multivariable logistic regression and linear mixed-effects models were used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced across groups. Patients receiving multimodal or regional-based regimens had significantly lower opioid consumption and mean pain scores on postoperative day 1 (NRS: 3.2 vs. 4.8, P<0.001) and lower PONV incidence (17.0% vs. 30.9%, P = 0.003) compared to opioid-dominant PCA. Multimodal and regional strategies were associated with earlier ambulation/flatus and shortened hospital stay (mean 6.5 vs. 8.2 days, P<0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was lowest in the multimodal group (13.0% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.04). Postoperatively, NLR and CRP elevations were significantly attenuated in multimodal and regional groups (both P<0.001). Adjusted analyses confirmed that multimodal analgesia independently reduced the risk of prolonged hospitalization (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.87, P = 0.013) and complications (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.99, P = 0.048). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent benefit across age, BMI, surgical approach, tumor stage, and comorbidity strata. Conclusion: Comprehensive multimodal analgesia significantly reduces opioid consumption, improves pain control, accelerates postoperative recovery, and attenuates perioperative inflammatory responses in women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. These findings support the integration of multimodal analgesia into standard perioperative care protocols in gynecologic oncology, with the potential to enhance both clinical and biological outcomes. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these results and explore long-term oncologic implications.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerinflammationmultimodal analgesiapostoperative recoveryretrospective cohort study

Identifiers

PMID41988135
PMCPMC13076245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.