ArticleRSC advances2026
Process optimization and characterization of fatty acids and lipid concomitants in the aqueous extraction of camellia oil.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study established an aqueous-based method for extracting camellia oil (CO). The optimized process, determined on the basis of bulk oil yield, consisted of sequential procedures: steaming (20 min), enzymatic hydrolysis (1% cellulase, 1% alkaline protease) and aqueous extraction. This process was named steaming aqueous enzymatic extraction (SAEE). Compared with the unheated sample, steaming pretreatment contributed to a 17.56% enhancement in the extraction rate of bulk oil, which was attributed to its degrading effect on cell wall structure and its reduction effect on cellulose crystallinity. In addition, CO was further evaluated in terms of fatty acid profile, deterioration indicators and lipid concomitants. Oleic, linoleic, palmitic and stearic acids were the dominant fatty acids, and oleic acid had the highest content (77.34% ± 0.38% to 77.58% ± 0.24%). The acid values ranged from 0.30 ± 0.02 to 0.35 ± 0.03 mg KOH per g, and the peroxide values were between 0.03 ± 0.00 and 0.04 ± 0.00 g per 100 g. Moreover, phenolics, α-tocopherol, squalene and phytosterols were present in the CO, and α-tocopherol was the distinguishing component, ranging from 277.62 ± 0.77 to 281.33 ± 4.86 mg kg
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.