ArticleInternational journal of LGBTQ+ youth studies2026
"
Article in International journal of LGBTQ+ youth studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "I make those in my imagination": A guide to prioritizing children's agency and inclusion in research with the Make-and-Tell arts-based method.International journal of qualitative methodsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gender-creative children have an elevated risk of healthcare avoidance and adverse health outcomes related to stigma and discrimination. Despite evidence that family affirmation is protective and pediatric providers influence care outcomes, young children's perspectives related to their social support and clinical experiences remain underrepresented in health research. Indeed, children's agency has been historically restricted in healthcare and health research. This community-engaged, artsbased, qualitative study used Draw-and-Tell Conversations-a participatory approach combining drawing, storytelling, and writing-with 12 U.S.-based gender-creative children (ages 5-10). Although children's caregivers completed surveys to contextualize findings, the project highlighted children's capacity to report on their own experiences. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and poetic inquiry. Participants expressed discomfort in clinical settings but identified trusted adults with whom they could discuss gender. Drawing facilitated confidence and clarity in communication. Findings reveal missed opportunities in pediatric care and research to engage directly with gender-creative children. This study contributes child-centered, empirically grounded recommendations for gender-affirming care and highlights the value of arts-based methods in health research with children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.