ArticleQuantitative plant biology2026
Environmentally dependent wood density influences forest structure and dynamics in a demographic vegetation model.
Article in Quantitative plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wood density (WD) is a crucial anatomical trait influencing forest carbon storage. However, dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) typically assume a fixed species-level WD, neglecting environment-driven variability. In this proof-of-concept study, we explore the potential impact of dynamic WD on tree- and forest-level carbon storage by integrating a simple temperature-response function of WD into the DGVM LPJ-GUESS from Smith et al., 2014. Simulations along a temperature gradient show that incorporating environmentally responsive WD can substantially alter simulated stand structure and carbon stocks. Overall, our model experiments illustrated that sites with higher WD had more, but smaller trees, which stored less carbon compared to the standard model. The strongest effects were predicted to appear before canopy closure, where per-tree carbon deviated by up to 32%. This exploratory study suggests the need to represent a mechanism for dynamic WD to better assess ecological feedbacks to forest carbon storage predictions, particularly in young and regenerating forests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.