Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41988079›Full record

ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2026

Comparative evaluation of electrode configuration for optimizing positive dielectrophoresis trapping of CCRF-CEM cells.

Miftakhul Firdhaus, Ulya Farahdina, Nasori Nasori, Endarko Endarko, Agus Rubiyanto

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miftakhul FirdhausLaboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytic, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia.
Ulya FarahdinaLaboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytic, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia.
Nasori NasoriLaboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytic, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia.
Endarko EndarkoLaboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytic, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia.
Agus RubiyantoLaboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytic, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is a promising label-free technique for bioparticle manipulation, offering significant potential for diagnostic application such as isolation and trapping of cancerous CCRF-CEM cells. The efficacy of DEP trapping is critically dependent on the interaction between the cell's dielectric properties and the spatial gradient of the squared electric field (∇|E

Indexed as

CCRF-CEMdielectrophoresiselectrode geometryinterdigitated electrodespositive dielectrophoresis

Identifiers

PMID41988079
PMCPMC13077101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.