ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2026
Perspectives of Surgical Branch Residents on Anatomy Education and Its Importance.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the pre-graduation anatomy training of residents from multiple surgical specialties and to assess their views and needs concerning anatomy during their surgical residency training. Methods: Following the acquisition of the requisite institutional approvals, a questionnaire prepared using the Google Survey platform was circulated online among physicians at various stages of surgical residency training. This multicenter study included participants from multiple hospitals across different cities in Türkiye. Questions about participants' demographic characteristics and experiences with anatomy training during both their undergraduate and specialist training were asked. All responses were analyzed statistically. Results: A total of 143 surgical residents participated in the study. Of the participants, 31.5% were female and 68.5% were male, and the mean age was 28±2.8 years. Of the residents, 67.1% had taken anatomy courses in the first two semesters of medical school, and 67.7% stated that they found their medical education inadequate for surgical residency. During their undergraduate education, 97.2% of the participants received face-to-face anatomy practice training, 47.6% received training with cadavers and plastic models. In addition, those who were trained with cadavers were more supportive of anatomy integration (p=0.031). It was also noteworthy that senior residents (defined as those with ≥2 years of residency training) considered anatomy integration into surgical residency training more necessary (p=0.006). Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of anatomy knowledge in surgical training and emphasizes its importance in the effective integration of education during surgical residency training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.