ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Real-world practices and barriers in endoscopic submucosal dissection training: International comprehensive survey.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection Within the Therapeutic Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables curative resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia but requires structured training. Although European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) curricula exist, real-world practices and barriers remain unclear. Methods: We conducted an anonymous web-based survey (April-July 2025) with 55 items assessing training opportunities, barriers, curriculum adherence, and quality metrics, stratified by role and annual ESD volume. Results: We received 288 responses (137 trainees, 151 trainers) from 39 countries across five geographic macro-areas. Nearly half (47.2%) had undertaken structured training, but only 46.5% fulfilled ESGE/ASGE curricula, with marked variation by center volume (69.6% in high-volume vs 26.8% in low-volume, Conclusions: This international survey reveals substantial disparities in ESD training and calls for coordinated efforts to improve access to structured curricula, mentorship, and affordable training models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.