Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41988025›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2026

Endoloop-assisted endoscopic removal of over-the-scope and full-thickness resection device clips: Prospective study.

Tobias Blasberg, Lukas Hiebel, Moritz Meiborg, Johannes Richl, Florian Alexander Michael, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Ahmad Amanzada, Volker Ellenrieder, Juergen Hochberger, Wedi Edris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tobias BlasbergGastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany.
Lukas HiebelClinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Moritz MeiborgGastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany.
Johannes RichlGastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany.
Florian Alexander MichaelDepartment of Medicine I Gastroenterology Hepatology Pneumology Allergology Endocrinology Diabetology, Medical Clinic 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ali Seif Amir HosseiniDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ahmad AmanzadaClinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Volker EllenriederClinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Juergen HochbergerDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Charite Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Wedi EdrisGastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: The over-the-scope (OTS) clip system is an established tool for endoscopic management of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, fistulas, and, in its modified form as the full-thickness resection device (FTRD), for resection of gastrointestinal lesions. In selected cases, clip removal is required. Conventional techniques often demand costly devices and may be time-consuming. This study evaluated a novel, simple technique for endoscopic removal of OTS and FTRD clips using an endoloop, focusing on feasibility and safety. Patients and methods: This prospective single-center study included patients who had undergone OTS or FTRD clip placement and required clip removal between March 2021 and October 2024. The removal procedure involved positioning an endoloop underneath the clip. Follow-up endoscopy within 6 months assessed clip detachment. The primary endpoint was the success rate for clip removal; the secondary endpoint was incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 18 patients underwent endoloop-assisted removal of OTS (50%, 9/18) or FTRD (50%, 9/18) clips. Endoloop placement was performed at a median of 94 days (range: 27-472) after OTS clip placement and 97 days (range: 0-274) after EFTR. Follow-up endoscopy confirmed clip detachment after a median of 107 days (range: 33-220) for OTS and 114 days (range: 5-203) for FTRD clips. Clip removal was successful in all patients (100%), with no AEs observed. Conclusions: Endoloop-assisted removal of OTS and FTRD clips appears to be effective and safe, representing an addition to current options for endoscopic clip removal.

Indexed as

Endoscopy Lower GI TractEndoscopy Upper GI TractLower GI bleedingNon-variceal bleedingPolyps / adenomas / ...Precancerous conditions & cancerous lesions (displasia and cancer) stomachUlcers (peptic and other)

Identifiers

PMID41988025
PMCPMC13077233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.