ArticleSpine surgery and related research2026
Relationship between the Scottie Dog Sign and Cleft Distance in Lumbar Spondylolysis.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Scottie dog sign on plain oblique radiography is an imaging evaluation indicator for detecting lumbar spondylolysis; however, if the cleft distance is small, the sensitivity of this method is low, making it difficult to detect the Scottie dog sign. Detailed studies on this aspect are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the Scottie dog sign and cleft distance in patients with terminal-stage bilateral lumbar spondylolysis. Methods: The retrospective, cross-sectional study included 75 patients with 150 clefts of lumbar spondylolysis, all of whom had terminal-stage bilateral lumbar spondylolysis at the time of their first visit to our hospital. Patients were classified into the Scottie dog sign-positive group (P) and negative group (N). The mean cleft distance between the two groups was compared by a t-test using the sagittal and axial planes of computed tomography (CT) images. Results: The mean cleft distance in groups P and N, respectively, was 3.05±2.00 mm and 1.96±2.38 mm in sagittal planes (p<0.01), and 2.64±1.70 mm and 1.92±1.93 mm in axial planes (p<0.01), with significant differences observed between groups. However, in some cases, the Scottie dog sign was negative even when the cleft distance was large, depending on the angle of the bone defect. Conclusions: We observed an association between the Scottie dog sign and cleft distance in patients with terminal-stage bilateral lumbar spondylolysis. The cleft distance in cases where the Scottie dog sign was positive was larger than that in cases where the Scottie dog sign was negative. These findings suggest that measuring the cleft distance using CT may help predict the visibility of the Scottie dog sign on plain radiography, thereby aiding in the diagnostic evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.