ArticleSpine surgery and related research2026
The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Pseudarthrosis Rates Following Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multi-level lumbar fusion carries exceptionally high pseudarthrosis risk, with reported rates reaching 35% in contemporary series; however, the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on fusion outcomes remains underexplored in this high-risk population. Recent evidence associates PPIs with increased pseudarthrosis in single-level cervical and lumbar fusions, given their established links to impaired bone metabolism. This study is the first to evaluate their association, specifically in multi-level lumbar fusion, where extended fusion constructs and heightened biomechanical demands amplify biological vulnerability to pseudarthrosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 9,608 adults undergoing elective ≥2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion from the TriNetX database. The exposed cohort comprised patients with sustained postoperative PPI use (≥3 months), while controls had no PPI prescriptions. Rigorous 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) balanced 15 covariates, including demographics (age, sex, race), comorbidities (diabetes, osteoporosis, gastroesophageal reflux disease), body mass index categories, and medication exposures (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) between cohorts. Pseudarthrosis incidence was assessed at standardized 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year postoperative intervals. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: After PSM (n=2,739 per cohort), PPI users did not demonstrate a significantly elevated pseudarthrosis risk at 6 months (17.9% vs. 16.2%; risk ratio [RR]=1.10, p=0.136). However, significant risk increases emerged at 1 year (20.3% vs. 16.5%; RR=1.23, p<0.001) and 3 years (22.0% vs. 18.9%; RR=1.16, p<0.01), revealing a time-dependent effect. Conclusions: This large-scale analysis demonstrated that postoperative PPI use is significantly associated with increased long-term pseudarthrosis risk following multi-level lumbar fusion, with absolute risk elevations of 3.8% (1 year) and 3.1% (3 years), a notable finding given baseline nonunion rates reported to exceeding 35% in multilevel constructs. PPIs may thus represent a modifiable perioperative risk factor, and careful evaluation of prolonged PPI therapy is warranted to minimize the risk of compromised fusion. Optimizing perioperative PPI management may offer surgeons a tangible opportunity to improve spinal fusion outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.