ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Inhibitory reversal of morpheme-mediated semantic priming in L2 Chinese: embodiment conflicts in conventional action metaphor processing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semantic priming typically facilitates lexical access; however, this facilitation may reverse into inhibition under certain interferences, such as embodied conflicts in Second Language (L2) processing. For adult L2 learners, automatic literal sensorimotor simulations may disrupt metaphorical integration, potentially inducing inhibitory reversal in conventional action metaphors [e.g., Chinese " "(chī kuī, literally "eat loss," figuratively "suffer the loss")]-a key gap in bilingual cognition. This study examines this reversal in L2 Chinese metaphor processing versus L1. Forty-three Vietnamese-speaking L2 learners of Chinese (HSK 5-6) and forty-seven first-language (L1) Chinese speakers completed a delayed-response semantic plausibility judgment task with morpheme-mediated semantic priming. Targets-literal, conventional metaphorical, and unrelated verb-object (VO) constructions-were each preceded by their identical verb morpheme (e.g., "" primes ""). Mixed-effects models revealed an opposite directional reversal in L2 learners: facilitation in literal versus unrelated baseline (shorter reaction times [RTs]; reduced errors) but inhibition in metaphorical versus unrelated baseline (elevated errors; nonsignificant RTs). In contrast to L2's reversal pattern, L1 Chinese speakers exhibited uniform dual inhibition across literal and metaphorical conditions (elevated errors; nonsignificant RTs), with a significant Group × Condition interaction. This study reveals an L2-specific reversal of priming in action metaphors (literal facilitation vs. metaphorical inhibition, primarily evident in error rates), originating from a dynamic mismatch between embodied simulations and semantic integration, a process potentially involving increased inhibitory control demands, while remaining consistent with broader processing costs at the behavioral level. These findings offer insights into the double-edged role of L2 embodiment in language processing -- helping Literal while hurting Metaphorical, providing implications for theories of embodied cognition and bilingualism and also informing practical pedagogy in L2 acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.