Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987963›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2026

Relational Autonomy, Dementia, and AI-Based Care Robots: Ethical Aspects of Using Machines to Care for People with Dementia.

Mario Kropf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mario KropfInstitute of Moral Theology, Faculty of Catholic Theology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-3276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the care sector, professionals face numerous challenges, for example due to a lack of resources, overburdened wards, or stressful situations with patients. In order to counter these and other stress factors, technical means have been increasingly assigned for some years, including care robots. These machines are intended to counteract staff shortages, relieve the burden on nurses, or generally consider the technical component of care. Numerous authors have dealt with ethical aspects surrounding these machines. However, the thematization of people with dementia and the associated question of relational autonomy through the use of AI-based care robots has been neglected so far. To this end, the first step is to consider dementia with reference to relational autonomy. These people are dependent on help, particularly due to the physical and mental impairments that become increasingly apparent in the course of dementia. In this context, a relational understanding of autonomy seems useful. In a second step, AI-based care robots and their current capabilities are presented. In the third step, ethical challenges and opportunities that arise from the integration of these machines for people with dementia are presented. To this end, the notion of relational autonomy is used on the one hand, and on the other hand, special reference is made to (1) a new interaction, (2) mobility, and (3) communication. It will be shown that relational aspects of autonomy can be realized to a certain extent by these robot companions, thus contributing to the care for people with dementia.

Indexed as

AI EthicsArtificial intelligenceCare robotsDementiaRelational autonomyRobot companions

Identifiers

PMID41987963
PMCPMC13076729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.