ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Motivational consequences influence obstacle crossing strategies.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young adults are likely to experience fewer physical consequences and less psychological stress associated with falls, despite frequent tripping and falling. Negative consequences associated with a task can stimulate anxiety, altering the obstacle crossing approach. This study employed motivational consequences of time and money to investigate how simulated anxiety alters obstacle crossing in young adults. We hypothesized negative motivational consequences would elicit more successful and cautious obstacle crossings. Sixty young adults, randomized into control and consequence groups, crossed obstacles while three-dimensional motion capture measured trajectories and joint kinematics during obstacle avoidance. The control group was 3.44 times more likely to contact an obstacle than the consequence group, demonstrating the consequences resulted in more successful crossings. Further, the consequence group adopted a more cautious avoidance strategy, exhibited by greater foot clearance and greater crossing step lengths, despite the consistent task constraints. These findings illustrate the importance of motivation and perceived consequences in obstacle crossing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.