ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Equitable access to the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa (ECOVA) findings from a qualitative enquiry in Zimbabwe.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant global disparities in vaccine distribution and access, prompting urgent calls to strengthen national delivery systems. In Zimbabwe and across the African continent, reliance on imports highlighted the need for both robust local distribution mechanisms and enhanced vaccine manufacturing capabilities. Africa's potential to produce vaccines, raw materials, and medical supplies exists, but its realization demands strategic investment and the promotion of public-private partnerships (PPPs). This study aims to analyze Zimbabwe's current COVID-19 vaccine distribution and delivery mechanisms, and explore the potential of PPPs to establish the necessary structures and processes to guarantee prompt access and administration of vaccines, particularly among vulnerable populations. Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with twenty purposively sampled Key Informants, all possessing specialized knowledge of Zimbabwe's Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) and the COVID-19 vaccination program. A standardized template, shared across the study consortium, guided the participant selection process. Results: Our qualitative investigation reveals that equitable vaccine access was hindered by the lack of routine adult vaccination compared to the well-established immunization of children through the EPI program. While utilizing the EPI infrastructure for COVID-19 vaccine rollout was deemed successful and commendable by key informants, it also faced criticism for perceived disparities in rural outreach, favouring urban areas. The stationary vaccination sites posed challenges for vulnerable groups like the elderly and those living with disabilities in rural regions who faced difficulties traveling long distances, underscoring the urgent need for greater efforts to ensure equitable vaccine access across all population segments. Discussion: Participant perspectives on local vaccine production in Zimbabwe reflect a blend of optimism and apprehension. Many expressed a strong desire for domestic vaccine development, recognizing its potential public health benefits and self-sufficiency. However, a sizeable number doubted Zimbabwe's current capacity to produce vaccines, citing economic challenges. Instead, they suggested forging partnerships with other African nations to collectively establish a regional or continental hub of excellence, sharing costs and reaping mutual benefits. An essential takeaway from this pandemic is the stark revelation of systemic gaps within the healthcare infrastructure. It is crucial to seize this opportunity to fortify the health system, ensuring its resilience in preparation for future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.