ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Co-produced evidence-based recommendations for cascade screening and secondary prevention in the relatives of people diagnosed with non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Over 80% of Thoracic Aortic Disease (TAD) is Non-Syndromic (NS-TAD). However, existing evidence-based guidelines on screening, and secondary prevention are extrapolated from studies in Syndromic-TAD. People with NS-TAD experience unwarranted variation in care. We co-produced evidence-based guidelines for NS-TAD with a view to standardising screening and prevention and identifying gaps in knowledge for future research. Methods: Using a co-production approach, research questions were defined and ranking using a modified Delphi Process. Evidence based treatment guidelines were developed based on systematic literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and consensus, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve research questions were selected. Searches screened 7,115 references and identified 121 relevant studies. No studies were identified for 5 questions, so only 7 were subjected to the GRADE synthesis. A strong recommendation was made for routine imaging of all first-degree relatives with NS-TAD. Conditional recommendations with low or very low certainty evidence were made for cascade screening in first- and second-degree relatives, the routine use of combined genetic and imaging for screening, whole exome sequencing over gene panels, and the application of Decision Support Tools to enable shared decision making about cascade screening in families. Research recommendations were made for the comparison of MRI vs. transthoracic echocardiography for cascade screening, and the management of NS-TAD in pregnancy. For secondary prevention, conditional recommendations with low or very low certainty evidence were made for ARBs and Beta Blockers in NS-TAD. Conclusions: Care of people with NS-TAD is guided by Low certainty evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.